Cases 21 - 30 of 296
Pietro v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65009
Defendant:
Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc., Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC and others
Plaintiff:
Lindsay Pietro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Rashad Lindsay
as 24-5089
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RASHAD LINDSAY
Hi-Vac Corporation et al v. Coley et al
as 2:2023cv04184
Plaintiff:
Hi-Vac Corporation and Alliance Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
Daniel J Coley, Matthew D Greenwold, Randy J DePuy and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Pietro v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2023cv02260
Defendant:
Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc., Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC and others
Plaintiff:
Lindsay Pietro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gavin, et al v. Lady Jane's Haircuts for Men Holding Company, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv12602
Plaintiff:
Jamie Gavin, Lindsay Gibbons and Jhamya Winters
Defendant:
Lady Jane's Haircuts for Men Holding Company, LLC, Lady Jane's Clearwater FL, LLC, Lady Jane's Moore OK, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Lindsay v. North Central Correctional Complex et al
as 1:2023cv01649
Petitioner:
Wendell Renard Lindsay, II
Defendant:
North Central Correctional Complex, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction and Adult Parole Authority/Adult Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Duneske v. Brooks Green et al
as 2:2023cv11948
Plaintiff:
Lindsay Ann Duneske
Defendant:
Tina Brooks Green and Mahrya Lovse
Dunekse v. 22nd Circuit Court Washtenaw County et al
as 2:2023cv11777
Plaintiff:
Lindsay Dunekse
Defendant:
22nd Circuit Court Washtenaw County, Darlene O'Brien, Andrew Fanta and others
Duneske v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 4:2023cv11778
Plaintiff:
Lindsay Ann Duneske
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Jeremy Jaskulski, Eli Bowers and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
