Cases 21 - 30 of 54
Michigan Restaurant & Lodging Association et al v. Gordon
as 1:2020cv01104
Defendant:
Robert Gordon
Plaintiff:
Michigan Restaurant & Lodging Association, Heirloom Hospitality Group, LLC and H.I.H. Inc. doing business as Suburban Inns
Amicus Curiae:
Michigan Health and Hospital Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mark Donaldson v. Nick Lyon, et al
as 20-2055
Petitioner / Appellant:
PEGGY HAMPEL
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, JULIE MCMURTRY, ROBERT GORDON and others
Plaintiff:
MARK P. DONALDSON
Libertas Classical Assn v. Gretchen Whitmer, et al
as 20-2085
Defendant / Appellee:
MARCIA MANSARAY, individually and in her official capacity as Deputy Health Administrator of the Ottawa County Department of Health
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LIBERTAS CLASSICAL ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
DANA NESSEL, individually and in her official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Michigan, ROBERT GORDON, individually and in his official capacity as Director of the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services and GRETCHEN WHITMER, individually and in her official capacity as Governor of the State of Michigan
Libertas Classical Association v. Whitmer et al
as 1:2020cv00997
Defendant:
Gretchen Whitmer, Robert Gordon, Dana Nessel and others
Plaintiff:
Libertas Classical Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mark Donaldson v. Nick Lyon, et al
as 20-2006
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, JULIE MCMURTRY, ROBERT GORDON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK P. DONALDSON
CH Royal Oak, LLC v. Whitmer et al
as 1:2020cv00570
Defendant:
Robert Gordon, Gretchen E. Whitmer and Dana Nessel
Plaintiff:
CH ROYAL OAK, LLC and CH Royal Oak, LLC doing business as Emagine Theatre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Susana Castillo, et al v. Gretchen Whitmer, et al
as 20-1815
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUSANA CASTILLO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, MANUEL NUNEZ MORALES, JR., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, TRUE BLUE BERRY MANAGEMENT, LLC, a Michigan limited liability company, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GARY MCDOWELL, in his official capacity as the Director of the Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development, ROBERT GORDON, in his official capacity as the Director of the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services and GRETCHEN WHITMER, in her official capacity as Governor of the State of Michigan
Amicus Curiae:
PUBLIC COUNSEL, NORTH CAROLINA JUSTICE CENTER, MAURICE & JANE SUGAR LAW CENTER FOR ECONOMIC & SOCIAL JUSTICE and others
Castillo et al v. Whitmer et al
as 1:2020cv00751
Defendant:
Robert Gordon, gary mcdowell and Gretchen Whitmer
Plaintiff:
Dulce Sostenes, Veronica Botella, Susana Castillo and others
Amicus Curiae:
Richard Abraham Primus
Petitioner:
Worker Advocates, Unions, Community Organizations and Health Experts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Midwest Institute of Health, et al v. Gretchen Whitmer, et al
as 20-1611
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JEFFERY GULICK, PRIMARY HEALTH SERVICES, PC, WELLSTON MEDICAL CENTER, PLLC and others
Defendant:
DANA NESSEL, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Michigan
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT GORDON, in his official capacity as Director of the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services and GRETCHEN WHITMER, in her official capacity as Governor of the State of Michigan
Midwest Institute of Health, et al v. Gretchen Whitmer, et al
as 20-1650
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JEFFERY GULICK, WELLSTON MEDICAL CENTER, PLLC, PRIMARY HEALTH SERVICES, PC and others
Defendant:
ROBERT GORDON, in his official capacity as Director of the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services and GRETCHEN WHITMER, in her official capacity as Governor of the State of Michigan
Defendant / Appellant:
DANA NESSEL, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Michigan
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
