Cases 21 - 30 of 7,044
Eugene Baker, et al v. Blackhawk Mining, LLC, et al
as 24-5490
Plaintiff:
EUGENE BAKER, LESTER BAKER, PATRICIA BAKER and others
Defendant:
BLACKHAWK MINING, LLC and PINE BRANCH MINING, LLC
Gudmundsen v. C.R. Bard, Inc. Polpropylene Hernia Mesh Product Liability Litigation
as 2:2024cv02729
Plaintiff:
Scott Gudmundsen
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. Polpropylene Hernia Mesh Product Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wilbanks v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02754
Plaintiff:
Alan Scott Wilbanks
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Griswold v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02749
Plaintiff:
Scott Griswold
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Householder v. Jordan et al
as 5:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Matthew Householder
Defendant:
Scott Jordan, Cookie Crews and Sgt. Jimo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gower v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02599
Plaintiff:
Scott Gower
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R. Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Paul Grundy, et al v. FCA US, LLC
as 24-1267
Plaintiff:
PAUL GRUNDY, CARL WOOD, CHRISTOPHER LANGLEY and others
Defendant:
FCA US, LLC
Ouellette v. Michigan Department of Corrections Parole Board et al
as 2:2024cv10750
Plaintiff:
Scott Mitchell Ouellette
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections Parole Board and Warden
Trauman v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65668
Plaintiff:
Scott Trauman
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
George Sachs v. Ricardo Inc., et al
as 24-1420
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SACHS, dba Paradyme Systems USA
Defendant:
RICARDO INC., WESLEY SCHARMEN, PHILIP MICHAEL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
