Cases 21 - 30 of 161
Sullivan v. Lake County Sheriff's Department, Painesville, Ohio et al
as 1:2023cv00369
Plaintiff:
Justin A. Sullivan
Defendant:
Lake County Sheriff's Department, Painesville, Ohio, Sheriff Frank Leonbruno, C.O. Pate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sullivan et al v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00718
Plaintiff:
Brian Sullivan and Judy Sullivan
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hueston v. Sullivan et al
as 3:2023cv00193
Plaintiff:
David E Hueston and David E. Hueston
Defendant:
Dennis Sullivan and Jaimie Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sullivan v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00070
Plaintiff:
James R. Sullivan
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00763
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sullivan v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04405
Plaintiff:
Deborah Sullivan
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Maye v. Corrections Center of Northeast Ohio, et al.
as 3:2022cv02176
Plaintiff:
Ricco L Maye
Defendant:
Craig Eiden, Masser, Kevin Bloom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maye v. Eiden et al
as 2:2022cv04249
Plaintiff:
Ricco L Maye
Defendant:
Craig Eiden, Masser, Kevin Bloom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Sullivan
as 3:2022cv02135
Petitioner:
Dashay Jones
Respondent:
Warden Dennis Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01921
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
