Cases 31 - 40 of 56
Cunningham v. DePuy, Inc. et al
as 1:2013dp20192
Plaintiff:
Charles P. Cunningham
Defendant:
DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited , DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Merrill Haviland, et al v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co
as 12-1958
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MERRILL HAVILAND, PHILIP C. BAMMEL, JOSEPH B. BIDWELL and others
Defendant - Appellee:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO.
Farmer's Trust Co. v. Bell et al
as 4:2012cv00822
Plaintiff:
Farmer's Trust Company
Defendant:
Jane Kinsman Bell, Craig W Bell, Thomas P Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Levine et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp20787
Plaintiff:
Faylyn M. Levine and Charles P. Levine
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Certificate of Judgment 2:11-cv-08607-R-DTB Central District of California et al v. Copeland
as 2:2011mc51405
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Charles P Copeland
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Copeland et al
as 4:2011mc00099
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Charles P. Copeland, Copeland Wealth Management, A Financial Advisory Corporation and Copeland Wealth Management, A Real Estate Corporation
Securities And Exchange Commission v. Copeland et al
as 5:2011mc00356
Plaintiff:
Securities And Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Charles P. Copeland and Copeland Wealth Management
Receiver:
Thomas C. Hebrank
Charles Carlisle v. Tim Brunsman
as 11-4133
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES P. CARLISLE
Respondent - Appellee:
TIM BRUNSMAN, Warden
Haviland, et al v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
as 2:2011cv13176
Plaintiff:
Merrill Haviland , Pillip C Bammel , Joseph B Bidwell and others
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
