Cases 31 - 40 of 65
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00399
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Acosta v. Jimmy & Nash Coney, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv10881
Petitioner:
R Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Jimmy & Nash Coney, Inc. and Jameel Saleh
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America v. Bray et al
as 2:2017cv12873
Plaintiff:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Defendant:
Tomika Bray, Khalilah Coney and Dajia Coney
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Coney v. TransUnion, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv11344
Plaintiff:
Brett Coney
Defendant:
TransUnion, LLC , Equifax Information Services , LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv10891
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Haskell Greer, et al v. City of Highland Park, MI, et al
as 17-1281
Plaintiff - Appellee:
HASKELL G. GREER, KIM R. GREER, ASHLEY GREER and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK, MI, CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHIEF KEVIN CONEY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv10825
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thomas et al v. City of Highland Park et al
as 2:2017cv10529
Plaintiff:
Michael Thomas and Porscha Thomas
Defendant:
City of Highland Park, Kevin Coney and Jamille Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haskell Greer, et al v. City of Highland Park, et al
as 16-2789
Plaintiff - Appellee:
HASKELL G. GREER, KIM R. GREER, ASHLEY GREER and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK, CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHIEF KEVIN CONEY and others
Defendant:
KELLY DUPUIS, JOHN DOE 1 THROUGH 10 and JANE DOE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv12282
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
