Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 125
Munson v. Bryan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv00078
Plaintiff: Kenneth H. Munson
Defendant: Robert C. Bryan, Michael Barbee, Santiago McKlean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. City of Cleveland et al
as 1:2015cv00007
Plaintiff: Michelle Marie Jones
Defendant: City of Cleveland , City of Cleveland Police Department , Michael R. White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fuller et al v. Franklin County of et al
as 1:2014cv00941
Plaintiff: Sierra Jean Fuller and Netta McCarthy
Defendant: Franklin County, Ohio, Franklin County Sheriff, John Doe I and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fuller et al v. Franklin County, Ohio et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv02556
Plaintiff: Sierra Jean Fuller and Netta McCarthy
Defendant: Franklin County, Ohio, Franklin County Sheriff, John Doe I and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Wheeling & Lake Erie Railway Company
as 1:2014cv02638
Plaintiff: James Clark
Defendant: Wheeling & Lake Erie Railway Company , John Doe, Inc., John Doe I and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Garcia et al v. SAR Holdings Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv01514
Plaintiff: Jose Garcia and Raymond Sutton
Defendant: SAR Holdings Inc. , Tony Burgess, Bob Liang and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Morris & Morris, PSC, et al v. Gayle Slaughter, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-5501
Plaintiff: KEITH RENE GUY, SR., on behalf of themselves and all other persons similarly situated, BARRY LYNN DEMUS, JR., CHRISTOPHER ANDRE WILLIAMS and others
Plaintiff - Appellee: JOHN DOE IV #1-#37, on behalf of themselves and other similarly-situated, but as yet unknown, John Doe and Jane Doe victims, as a class, JANE DOE IV #1- #6, on behalf of themselves and other similarly-situated, but as yet unknown, John Doe and Jane Doe victims, as a class, JOHN DOE II #1-33 (EXCEPTING #5, 9, 21, 26 & 27), on behalf of themselves and other similarly-situated, but as yet unknown, John Doe and Jane Doe victims, as a class and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: MORRIS & MORRIS P.S.C.
Defendant - Appellee: LEXINGTON FAYETTE URBAN COUNTY GOVERNMENT, fka The City Of Lexington, H. FOSTER PETTIT, Individually and official capacity, JAMES AMATO and others
Keith Guy, Sr., et al v. LFUCG, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-5496
Plaintiff: KEITH RENE GUY, SR., on behalf of themselves and all other persons similarly situated, BARRY LYNN DEMUS, JR., CHRISTOPHER ANDRE WILLIAMS and others
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant: JOHN DOE IV #1-#37, on behalf of themselves and other similarly-situated, but as yet unknown, John Doe and Jane Doe victims, as a class, JANE DOE IV #1- #6, on behalf of themselves and other similarly-situated, but as yet unknown, John Doe and Jane Doe victims, as a class, JOHN DOE II #1-33 (EXCEPTING #5, 9, 21, 26 & 27), on behalf of themselves and other similarly-situated, but as yet unknown, John Doe and Jane Doe victims, as a class and others
Plaintiff - Appellant Cross-Appellee: REX ROE #48, #62, #91, #97, #103, On behalf of themselves and all others who are similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee Cross-Appellant: LEXINGTON FAYETTE URBAN COUNTY GOVERNMENT, fka The City Of Lexington, H. FOSTER PETTIT, in official and individual capacity, JAMES AMATO, Individually and others
v. City Of Memphis, Tennessee et al
as 2:2014cv02219
Defendant: City Of Memphis, Tennessee, Shelby County, Tennessee, City of Memphis Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schalk v. City Of Memphis, Tennessee et al
as 2:2014cv02220
Plaintiff: Michael Schalk
Defendant: City Of Memphis, Tennessee, Shelby County, Tennessee, City of Memphis Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?