Cases 31 - 40 of 588
Prentice v. Newrez, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv12364
Plaintiff:
Glenn-Michael Prentice, Sr
Defendant:
Newrez, LLC d/b/a Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing, Trott Law, P.C., Marcy Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv12367
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Dobronski v. Russo et al
as 2:2023cv12288
Plaintiff:
Mark W. Dobronski
Defendant:
Anthony J. Russo, Jr. Doing business as The Russo Firm, Anthony John Russo, Jr. Doing business as RP Law LLC, Matthew A. Dolman P.A. Doing business as Dolman Law Group and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00926
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Rojas v. DV Injury Law PLLC et al
as 2:2023cv12140
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alejandro Rojas and Jorge Alejandro Rojas [E-filer]
Defendant:
DV Injury Law PLLC, Venar Raad Ayar and Daniel P Heilbrun
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv12069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Lockhart v. DeLuca et al
as 2:2023cv11873
Plaintiff:
Jameel Lockhart
Defendant:
Steven DeLuca, Wesley J. Neal, Leslie Kim Smith and others
Apelbaum et al v. Lambert et al
as 2:2023cv11718
Plaintiff:
Yaacov Apelbaum and Xrvision, Ltd.
Defendant:
STEFANIE LYNN LAMBERT, The Law Office of Stefanie L. Lambert, PLLC, Bill Bachenberg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv11576
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
DeLuca v. Lockhart et al
as 2:2023cv11436
Plaintiff:
Steven DeLuca, Wesley J. Neal, Holzman Law and others
Defendant:
Jameel Lockhart
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
