Cases 31 - 40 of 58
Williams et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc. et al
as 1:2013dp20643
Plaintiff:
Andrea Williams and Dan R. Williams
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy Intermational Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Larry Lee v. Dean Willey, et al
as 12-2393
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY LEE
Defendant - Appellee:
DEAN WILLEY, T. ZISCHKE, BAGLEY and others
Defendant:
R. WILLIAMS, JOHN DOE and JANE DOE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-6027
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Williams et al v. Citizens First Mortgage, L.L.C, et al
as 2:2012cv11468
Plaintiff:
William R. Williams and Diane M. Williams
Defendant:
Citizens First Mortgage, L.L.C, a Michigan limited liability corporation, Central Mortgage Loan Servicing Company, a foreign corporation and Freddie Mac, a federally chartered corporation
Williams, Jr. v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp20131
Plaintiff:
Milbourne R. Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baumgardner v. Tenacity Manufacturing Company et al
as 1:2011cv00794
Plaintiff:
Timothy Baumgardner
Defendant:
Tenacity Manufacturing Company , Louisianna Binding Service, Inc. , Kofile Preservation, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv14131
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Williams v. Farley
as 4:2011cv00256
Petitioner:
Kenneth R. Williams
Respondent:
Warden Farley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Williams et al v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
as 5:2010cv14967
Plaintiff:
Ronald D. Williams and Brenda R. Williams
Defendant:
U.S. Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
