Cases 41 - 50 of 549
McGlynn v. Ford UAW Retirement Plan et al
as 2:2022cv12462
Plaintiff:
Louis Edward McGlynn
Defendant:
Ford UAW Retirement Plan, Ford Motor Company and Ford-UAW Retirement Plan Board of Administration
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Rhodes et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv12110
Plaintiff:
Brenda L. Rhodes and Stephen T. Rhodes
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Beck v. Ford Motor Company
as 4:2022cv12079
Plaintiff:
Steven Beck, David Braden, Mark Willard and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv12068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Coates v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2022mc51349
Plaintiff:
Millentine Coates
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and XYZ Corporation
Interested Party:
Veoneer US, Inc.
Pacheco v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv11927
Plaintiff:
Anthony Pacheco, Jeffrey King, Brian Sutton and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv11902
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Sulligan v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv11668
Plaintiff:
Amber Sulligan, Eddie Gutierrez, Spenser Henry and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Boyle v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv11545
Plaintiff:
Kenneth L. Boyle
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Neo Wireless, LLC v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv11402
Plaintiff:
Neo Wireless, LLC
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
