Cases 41 - 50 of 64
Acosta v. Jewelry Television (PLR1)
as 3:2017cv00545
Petitioner:
R. Alexander Acosta
Respondent:
Jewelry Television
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Acosta v. Nino Salvaggio Fruit and Vegetable Market of Clinton Township, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv14136
Defendant:
Nino Salvaggio Fruit and Vegetable Market of Clinton Township, Inc., Kirk Taylor, Nino Salvaggio Fruit and Vegetable Market of Troy, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01585
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Copperhead Construction, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00110
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Copperhead Construction, LLC , Sara-Tech, LLC and Reynolds Baldwin, III
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Genesee Manor, Inc., d/b/a Genesee Manor, a Michigan Corporation et al
as 5:2017cv13884
Plaintiff:
R Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Genesee Manor, Inc., d/b/a Genesee Manor, a Michigan Corporation, Michelle Ray and Gary Ray
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Big G Express, Inc. et al (TV3)
as 4:2017cv00073
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Big G Express, Inc., Big G Express Employee Stock Ownership Plan, David A. Nolan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Acosta v. Baum et al
as 2:2017cv13831
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
David M. Baum , David M. Baum, P.C. Profit Sharing Plan and David M. Baum, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
R. Alexander Acosta, Secretary of Labor, U.S. Dept. of Labor v. Ultimate Lawn Services, L.L.C., an S-Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv13629
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta, Secretary of Labor, U.S. Dept. of Labor
Defendant:
Ultimate Lawn Services, L.L.C., an S-Corporation, Angela Sheker, an individual and John Sheker, an individual
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Peregrino et al
as 3:2017cv01381
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Raul Peregrino
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. American Classic Construction, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00875
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
American Classic Construction, Inc. , Nathan Thompson , Jacob Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
