Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 97
Andre Coleman v. Asher Goldstein, et al
as 12-1716
Plaintiff - Appellant: ANDRE LEE COLEMAN
Defendant - Appellee: ASHER GOLDSTEIN, Corrections Officer, THOMAS M.L. WOLVEN, Hearings Officer, JOHN KELLEY and others
Colbert v. Ives We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2012cv00099
Petitioner: William Colbert
Respondent: Richard B. Ives
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv00084
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Smith v. Ives
as 6:2012cv00053
Plaintiff: Nathan Smith
Defendant: Richard B. Ives
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Totten v. State of Washington D.C. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2012cv00023
Petitioner: Ronnie Totten
Respondent: State of Washington D.C. and Richard B. Ives
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Terry et al v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 6:2012cv00003
Plaintiff: Artemis Terry and Ronnie Totten
Defendant: Bureau of Prisons, Richard B. Ives, M. Broughton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pena v. Cross et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2011cv00349
Petitioner: Victor Pena
Respondent: Richard B. Ives
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wendel Wardell, Jr. v. Richard Ive
as 11-6530
Petitioner - Appellant: WENDEL ROBERT WARDELL, JR.
Respondent - Appellee: RICHARD B. IVES, Warden
Dalrymple et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011dp23054
Plaintiff: Ann W. Dalrymple and Richard B. Dalrymple
Defendant: DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Turner v. Ives We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2011cv00340
Plaintiff: Kory Turner
Defendant: Richard B. Ives
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?