Cases 41 - 50 of 202
Glaser v. Smith et al.
as 4:2022cv01019
Plaintiff:
Donald S. Glaser
Defendant:
Correction Officer Austin Smith, Correction Officer Scott Gorby, Correction Officer Philip Carter and others
Interested Party:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01935
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
D.M. et al v. Lassus Bros. Oil, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00515
Plaintiff:
D. M., T. M. and M. M.
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Lassus Bros. Oil, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant:
Austin Schudel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Williams et al v. The City of Columbus
as 2:2022cv01831
Plaintiff:
Austin Williams and Alexandra Gene Davis
Defendant:
The City of Columbus, Thomas Quini, Officer Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Austin v. Ashcraft et al
as 1:2022cv00159
Plaintiff:
Jason Andrew Austin
Defendant:
James Ashcraft, Demetrius Yates, John Boykin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Austin Powder Company
as 2:2022cv01645
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Austin Powder Company
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
Austin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv00067
Plaintiff:
Brandy Austin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Austin v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05555
Plaintiff:
Connie Austin
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carr, III v. Austin Powder Company
as 2:2021cv05140
Plaintiff:
Cyrus Carr, III
Defendant:
Austin Powder Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
