Cases 51 - 60 of 63
Murphy v. Cox et al
as 2:2011cv02852
Plaintiff:
Chuck Murphy
Defendant:
Edward Herman Cox and FedEx Freight, Inc.
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Price v. Fedex Freight, Inc.
as 3:2011cv00539
Plaintiff:
John A. Price
Defendant:
Fedex Freight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv02755
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Employment Discrimination
Jose Rodriguez v. Fedex Freight East, Incorporat
as 10-1173
Debtor:
In re: JOSE ANTONIO RODRIGUEZ
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE ANTONIO RODRIGUEZ, Stuart Gold, Trustee For, The estate of
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDEX FREIGHT EAST, INCORPORATED
Rodriguez v. Fedex Freight East, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv14926
Plaintiff:
Jose A Rodriguez
Defendant:
Fedex Freight East, Inc., Fedex Freight East, Inc., Rodney Adkinson and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv14702
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Type:
Other Statutes
Pennell v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company et al
as 5:2009cv00485
Plaintiff:
David L. Pennell
Defendant:
Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company and Fedex Freight East, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jose Rodriguez v. Fedex Freight East, Incorporat
as 08-2272
Debtor:
In re: JOSE ANTONIO RODRIGUEZ
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE ANTONIO RODRIGUEZ, Stuart Gold, Trustee For, The estate of
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDEX FREIGHT EAST, INCORPORATED
Amicus Curiae:
MICHIGAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE and NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD, DETROIT CHAPTER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv10637
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
