Cases 51 - 60 of 1,953
Scott v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00456
Plaintiff:
Kurt Scott
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Scott v. Genesis Recovery and Wellness of Ohio LLC
as 1:2024cv00205
Plaintiff:
Lakeshia Scott
Defendant:
Genesis Recovery and Wellness of Ohio LLC
Shade v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
Scott A. Shade
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Webb v. Beridon et al
as 1:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Anthony Webb
Defendant:
Magistrate Thomas O. Beridon, W. Leaman and Attorney W. Scott Leaman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Scott v. Warden, Mansfield Correctional Institution
as 1:2024cv00058
Petitioner:
Curtis Scott
Respondent:
Warden, Mansfield Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Warden, Mansfield Correctional Institution
as 2:2024cv00352
Petitioner:
Curtis Scott
Respondent:
Warden, Mansfield Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Banks v. Doe et al.
as 1:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Banks, III
Defendant:
Scott John Doe, Jane Doe Williams and Jane Doe Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sammons et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00325
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Jane Sammons and Scott Sammons
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
