Cases 61 - 70 of 588
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv11340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Rice et al v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation et al
as 2:2022cv11345
Plaintiff:
Keith Rice and Paris Motley Rice
Defendant:
Freedom Mortgage Corporation, Robert J. Kinggo III, Trott Law, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv11323
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Rice et al v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2022cv11143
Plaintiff:
Keith Rice and Paris Motley-Rice
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Robert J. Kinggo III, Trott Law, P.C. and others
Ponte v. Quantum Law Group, PLLC
as 2:2022cv11033
Plaintiff:
Robert Ponte
Defendant:
Quantum Law Group, PLLC and Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co., L.P.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Ponte v. Shermeta Law Group, PLLC
as 2:2022cv11035
Plaintiff:
Robert Ponte
Defendant:
Shermeta Law Group, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
RAVEN et al v. LARRY ELKUS, ESQ. et al
as 5:2022cv10971
Plaintiff:
Michael Raven, Loyola Energy, LLC and Ellicott, LLC
Defendant:
Larry Elkus, Esq., Law Office Of Lawrence M. Elkus, P.C., Lancaster Exploration And Development, Co., LLC and others
McDermitt v. Shermeta Law Group PLLC
as 1:2022cv00273
Plaintiff:
Holly McDermitt
Defendant:
Shermeta Law Group P.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Rice et al v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2022cv10608
Plaintiff:
Keith Rice and Paris Motley-Rice
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Sung Hung, Trott Law, P.C. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
