Cases 61 - 70 of 656
Bradley v. USA
as 5:2023cv00519
Petitioner:
Brad Lewis Bradley
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Meyers Roman Friedberg & Lewis Co., LPA v. Baird et al
as 1:2023cv00491
Plaintiff:
Meyers Roman Friedberg & Lewis Co., LPA
Defendant:
Kevin Baird, KevGar Holdco, LLC, KRB Opportunity Zone Fund, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Gardner et al v. Matco Tools Corporation
as 5:2023cv00383
Plaintiff:
Toby Clarkson Gardner and Keston Lewis
Defendant:
Matco Tools Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Munger v. Matco Tools Corporation
as 5:2023cv00337
Plaintiff:
Andrew Munger, Toby Clarkson Gardner, Keston Lewis and others
Defendant:
Matco Tools Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lewis v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00708
Plaintiff:
Troree Lewis
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc, Davol and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Carroll v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00669
Plaintiff:
Richard Lewis Carroll
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lewis et al v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00531
Plaintiff:
Edward Lewis and Lewis C. Frances
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Lewis v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00513
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Lewis
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
McComb v. Best Buy Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00028
Plaintiff:
Robert S. McComb
Defendant:
Best Buy Inc., Annah Jane Doe, Dorian John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
