Cases 71 - 80 of 122
Leslie Lawson v. Glenn Dotson, et al
as 14-5409
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LESLIE LEE LAWSON
Defendant - Appellee:
GLENN DOTSON, CUAI at Kentucky State Reformatory, KRYSTAL WOODS, C/O at Kentucky State Reformatory, KIMBERLY JEFFERSON, Sergeant at Kentucky State Reformatory and others
Devon Parker v. Fontella Mason, et al
as 14-5373
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEVON J. PARKER
Defendant - Appellee:
FONTELLA MASON, Alternative Disciplinary Hearing Officer
Defendant:
JOE EASTERLING, Warden, HCCF Warden, DARLENE MATTHEWS, Librarian, JOANNE HENSON, Unit Manager and others
Charles Fields v. Scott Sprader, et al
as 14-1393
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES EDWARD FIELDS
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT SPRADER, Deputy Warden, DAN LESATZ, Deputy Warden, CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Warden, Warden and others
Joseph Palmer v. Andrea Aikens, et al
as 14-1343
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH PALMER
Defendant - Appellee:
ANDREA AIKENS, Food Service Supervisor, SHEILA E. O'BRIEN, Hearings Officer, JACQUELINE NADEAU, Assistant Deputy Warden and others
Raymond Carr v. Raymond Booker, et al
as 14-1258
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND LEON CARR
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYMOND BOOKER, Warden, DARRELL STEWARD, Deputy Warden, CORNELL HOWARD and others
Charles Fields v. Denise Gerth, et al
as 14-1244
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES EDWARD FIELDS
Defendant - Appellee:
DENISE GERTH, Case Manager, ARUS and LINDA MAKI, Hearing Officer
Nancy Woods, et al v. Linnie Willis, et al
as 14-3029
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NANCY WOODS, in her own right and as representatives of all similarly situated Lucas Metropolitan Housing Authority Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program participants. and CARLA MCCULLOUGH, in her own right and as representatives of all similarly situated Lucas Metropolitan Housing Authority Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program participants.
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
CAULENE FULLER, in her own right and as representatives of all similarly situated Lucas Metropolitan Housing Authority Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program participants.
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
LINNIE WILLIS, personally and in her official capacity as Executive Director, Lucas Metropolitan Housing Authority
Defendant:
MARGARET MIRACOLA, personally and in her official capacity as Director, Lucas Metropolitan Housing Choice Voucher Program and CANDACE RENNER, personally and in her official capacity as Hearing Officer, Lucas Metropolitan Housing Authority
Nancy Woods, et al v. Linnie Willis, et al
as 14-3016
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NANCY WOODS, in her own right and as representatives of all similarly situated Lucas Metropolitan Housing Authority Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program participants., CAULENE FULLER, in her own right and as representatives of all similarly situated Lucas Metropolitan Housing Authority Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program participants. and CARLA MCCULLOUGH, in her own right and as representatives of all similarly situated Lucas Metropolitan Housing Authority Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program participants.
Defendant - Appellant:
LINNIE WILLIS, personally and in her official capacity as Executive Director, Lucas Metropolitan Housing Authority
Defendant:
MARGARET MIRACOLA, personally and in her official capacity as Director, Lucas Metropolitan Housing Choice Voucher Program and CANDACE RENNER, personally and in her official capacity as Hearing Officer, Lucas Metropolitan Housing Authority
Leslie Lawson v. Glenn Dotson, et al
as 13-6636
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LESLIE LEE LAWSON
Defendant - Appellee:
GLENN DOTSON, CUAI at Kentucky State Reformatory, KRYSTAL WOODS, C/O at Kentucky State Reformatory, KIMBERLY JEFFERSON, Sergeant at Kentucky State Reformatory and others
Robert Reeves v. W. Chapman, et al
as 13-2093
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT REEVES
Defendant:
W. CHAPMAN, Assistant Deputy Warden, L. JACOBSEN, Hearing Officer and RNC ENDERS
Defendant - Appellee:
K. SALISBURY, Captain, INSPECTOR BELEN and B. EVERS, RNU
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
