Cases 71 - 80 of 823
Peters v. Baldwin et al
as 2:2022cv03259
Petitioner:
Troy L Peters
Respondent:
Franklin Co. Sheriff Dallas Baldwin and Mike Turner
Defendant:
Tonja Phillips, Syble Sayon, Nalea Cobb Whiting and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Matics et al v. Maier
as 5:2022cv01410
Petitioner:
James Matics, Phillip Shank, Perian Dargun and others
Respondent:
Sheriff George T. Maier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Phillips v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03030
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Phillips
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01354
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Doe v. Cuyahoga County Community College et al
as 1:2022cv01287
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County Community College, Emanuela Friscioni, Amber Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00402
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Butler et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02694
Plaintiff:
Phillip Butler and Michelle Butler
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Phillips v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 3:2022cv01144
Plaintiff:
Travis C. Phillips
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Phillips v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02513
Plaintiff:
Linda Phillips
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
