Cases 81 - 90 of 117
Brown v. JP Morgan Chase Bank et al
as 2:2012cv10826
Plaintiff:
French Brown
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, Natalie Yaw and Daniel D Quick
1-800-DryClean, LLC v. de Cespedes-Garcia et al
as 2:2011cv15310
Plaintiff:
1-800-DryClean, LLC
Defendant:
Marlene de Cespedes-Garcia, Eric Garcia, EMCANGN, Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1127
ThermaPure, Inc. v. Quick Dry, Inc.
as 3:2011cv02595
Plaintiff:
ThermaPure, Inc.
Defendant:
Quick Dry, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Harrison v. MJR Group L. L. C. et al
as 2:2011cv14731
Plaintiff:
Ray M Harrison
Defendant:
MJR Group L. L. C. and Quick Cash ATM Services, Inc.
Quick et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011dp20769
Plaintiff:
Richard Quick and Barbara Quick
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Victory Lane Quick Oil Change Inc. v. Darwich et al
as 5:2011cv11786
Plaintiff:
Victory Lane Quick Oil Change Inc.
Defendant:
Magid Darwich , Darwich Brothers, LLC , Mazh, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Pennzoil-Quaker State Company v. RTO Lube, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv14271
Plaintiff:
Pennzoil-Quaker State Company
Defendant:
RTO Lube, LLC, RTO Oil, LLC, RTO Quick Lube, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Quick v. Smith et al
as 1:2010cv01543
Plaintiff:
Kelly Quick
Defendant:
Paul Smith, Francine Goldberg, Susan Goldberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quick Study Radiology, Inc. v. MDO Imaging Associates, PLC
as 1:2009cv01128
Plaintiff:
Quick Study Radiology, Inc.
Defendant:
MDO Imaging Associates, PLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Victory Lane Quick Oil Change, v. John Hoss, et al
as 09-2489
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VICTORY LANE QUICK OIL CHANGE, INC., a Michigan corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN C. HOSS, ROY W. STARBIRD and CHECKERED FLAG OIL CHANGE CENTER, INC., a Michigan corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
