Cases 81 - 90 of 1,783
Summers v. Shelat et al
as 1:2023cv00024
Plaintiff:
Kimberly D. Summers
Defendant:
Pranav A. Shelat and Wipro Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr Diversity-Notice of Removal
Oliphant v. Beacham et al
as 1:2023cv00008
Plaintiff:
Anthony D. Oliphant
Defendant:
Harvest L. Beacham and Central Transport LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 mv Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Weatherspoon v. Spigel Properties LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
Wilma D. Weatherspoon
Defendant:
Spigel Properties LLC, Spigel Properties Laredo, Inc., Spigel Properties, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Oates v. Fisher et al
as 3:2023cv00021
Plaintiff:
Keemont Louis Oates
Defendant:
Honorable Mayor Greg Fisher, Schaefer, D. Goldstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Lemaster
as 0:2022cv00117
Petitioner:
Iramm Wright
Respondent:
D. Lemaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
O'Neal v. LSCC
as 0:2022cv00115
Plaintiff:
Antonio D. O'Neal
Defendant:
LSCC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Wethington et al
as 1:2022cv00174
Plaintiff:
Misty Roberts
Defendant:
Joshua D. Wethington and United States of America
Baker v. Chandler et al
as 0:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
Ashley Heath A Baker, Anthony Baker, Ashley Heath Baker and others
Defendant:
Larry D. Chandler, Cookie Crews, Rhonda May and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00653
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cra Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Elms v. Dunbar et al
as 1:2022cv00164
Plaintiff:
Cody Lee Elms
Defendant:
Bobby Dunbar and Class D Coordinator Neil Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
