Cases 1 - 10 of 89,175
McKenzie v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2024cv00266
Petitioner:
Demorris Sanchez McKenzie
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Neisen v. Atwood
as 3:2024cv00732
Plaintiff:
Heather Neisen
Defendant:
Judge Bonita Jo Atwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. RARE Hospitality Group, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Angela Rogers
Defendant:
RARE Hospitality Group, LLC doing business as Longhorn Steakhouse, RARE Hospitality International, Inc. doing business as Longhorn Steakhouse and Darden Concepts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
King v. Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00729
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth King
Defendant:
Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Burnett v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00734
Plaintiff:
Terrance Burnett
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Dickson County Sheriff Office et al
as 3:2024cv00731
Plaintiff:
Ronnie McCoy
Defendant:
Dickson County Sheriff Office, Sheriff Eads, Chief Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clem v. Rausch
as 3:2024cv00733
Plaintiff:
Charles Ray Clem
Defendant:
David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perry v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00735
Plaintiff:
Cortney Perry
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Amazon.Com, Inc. et al v. Rudd
as 2:2024cv02410
Petitioner:
Amazon.Com, Inc. and Amazon Logistics, Inc.
Respondent:
Nikenya Rudd
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
