Cases 1 - 10 of 1,222
Davis Vamini v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03085
Plaintiff:
Debrah Davis Vamini
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harris v. Redwood et al
as 1:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
James Harris
Defendant:
Warden Donald Redwood, Deputy Warden Cynthia Davis, Deputy Warden Nicole Joseph and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02719
Plaintiff:
Joseph L. Davis
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Davis, Jr. v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02631
Plaintiff:
Clifford Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Titus v. Davis
as 2:2024cv02641
Petitioner:
Timothy Titus
Respondent:
Cynthia Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alexander v. Davis et al
as 1:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
Jerone Alexander
Defendant:
Cynthia D Davis, Charles O'Connor, N. Brabson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Krzywkowski v. Mohr et al
as 3:2024cv00850
Plaintiff:
Grady Krzywkowski
Defendant:
Mike Davis, Warden Keith Foley, Dessey Cheers and others
Interested Party:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poole v. Marco et al.
as 1:2024cv00847
Plaintiff:
Joyce Poole
Defendant:
Kenneth J. Marco, Richard Marco, John Oberholtzer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Davis v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65462
Plaintiff:
Kyle T Davis
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Titus v. Davis
as 5:2024cv00817
Petitioner:
Timothy Titus
Respondent:
Warden Cynthia Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
