Cases 1 - 10 of 297
Pointer v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv01807
Plaintiff:
Dennis Pointer
Defendant:
Ms. Annette Chambers Smith, Ron O'Brian, Michael Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knox et al v. Tee Jaye's Country Place, Inc.
as 2:2024cv01593
Plaintiff:
Tandy J Knox, Megan Drake, Macie R Jenkins and others
Defendant:
Tee Jaye's Country Place, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Harris v. Redwood et al
as 1:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
James Harris
Defendant:
Warden Donald Redwood, Deputy Warden Cynthia Davis, Deputy Warden Nicole Joseph and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00925
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00917
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jenkins v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02643
Plaintiff:
Dustin D. Jenkins
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jenkins v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02605
Plaintiff:
Orlando Jenkins
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R. Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Durst v. Chambers-Smith et al.
as 3:2024cv00835
Plaintiff:
McClain Durst
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Uriah Melton, Kimberly Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jenkins v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01716
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Jenkins
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jenkins v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02112
Plaintiff:
Leonard Jenkins
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
