Cases 1 - 10 of 24
USA v. Christopher Artrip
as 23-5734
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER W. ARTRIP
Rogers v. Mays et al
as 3:2023cv00782
Plaintiff:
Danny Eugene Rogers
Defendant:
Warden Tony Mays, Linda Stokes, Sean Lenard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Lewis et al
as 3:2023cv00660
Plaintiff:
Jason C. Johnson
Defendant:
Ernest Lewis, John Artrip, Officer Garrett Groesbeck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2022cv00754
Plaintiff:
H.C. Brown, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Tony Mays, Micheal Keys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Artrip v. SSA
as 0:2022cv00021
Plaintiff:
Billy J. Artrip
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Kline v. Artrip
as 2:2021cv00531
Plaintiff:
Steven Lee Kline
Defendant:
Gary Artrip
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grove v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (ODRC) et al
as 2:2018cv01492
Defendant:
Ms Bottorff, MD Abid I Rana, John Doe (X-50) and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Grove
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elkins v. Hudson et al
as 3:2017cv02179
Plaintiff:
David Elkins
Defendant:
Stuart Hudson, Andrew Eddy, Regional Nurse Administrator Eller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Artripe v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 2:2017cv00608
Petitioner:
Roger E Artripe
Respondent:
Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dennison et al v. Kentucky Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2014cv00679
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Lee Dennison and Teddy Albert Allman
Defendant:
Kentucky Department of Corrections, Roederer Correctional Complex, Mail Room Clerk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
