Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Valaise Smith v. COBX Co.
as 1:2022cv01102
Plaintiff:
Betty Valaise Smith
Defendant:
COBX Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Valaise Smith v. COBX Co.
as 2:2022cv12836
Plaintiff:
Betty Valaise Smith
Defendant:
COBX Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Betty Smith v. HPR Clinic, LLC, et al
as 20-3573
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BETTY E. SMITH, in her capacity as attorney-in-fact for Dr. Paul C. Smith, individually and on behalf of the ERISA-covered plan
Defendant / Appellee:
DOCTOR RYAN FRYMAN, DOCTOR HARRY NGUYEN and HPR CLINIC, LLC
Smith et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv01495
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Betty R. Smith and Darrell T. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01830
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Darrell Smith and Betty Ray-Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. HPR Clinic, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv00464
Defendant:
Harry Nguyen, M.D., HPR Clinic, LLC and Ryan Fryman, M.D.
Plaintiff:
Betty E Smith and Betty E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Smith v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv01317
Plaintiff:
Betty A. Smith
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Smith v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp21207
Plaintiff:
Betty L. Smith
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 1:2010cv00074
Plaintiff:
Betty Jane Smith
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith v. Minter Foster Group Care Home, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv02620
Plaintiff:
Betty M. Smith
Defendant:
Minter Foster Group Care Home, Inc. and Linda Bush
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
