Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Ash v. Cadence Bank, N.A.
as 2:2022cv02323
Not Classified By Court:
Clerk W. Aaron Hall
Plaintiff:
Sherita Ash
Defendant:
Cadence Bank, N.A. formerly doing business as BANCORPSOUTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Cadence Bank, N.A. v. Hurl et al
as 2:2020cv06403
Defendant:
Patrick C. Disney, Thomas H. Witthuhn, Donald F. Schumacher II and others
Plaintiff:
Cadence Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cadence Bank, N.A. v. DLO Title, LLC
as 3:2017cv01170
Plaintiff:
Cadence Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
DLO Title, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cadence Bank, N.A. v. Cammeron et al
as 3:2016cv02384
Plaintiff:
Cadence Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Richard L. Cammeron and Margo S. Cammeron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Cadence Bank, N.A. v. Barclay
as 3:2013cv00143
Plaintiff:
Cadence Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Marc T. Barclay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Cadence Bank, N.A. v. Enlow & Associates, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00282
Plaintiff:
Cadence Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Enlow & Associates, Inc. , Mark W. Enlow and Tracey L. Enlow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cadence Bank, N.A. v. Sabre Defence Industries, LLC et al
as 3:2010cv01042
Plaintiff:
Cadence Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Sabre Defence Industries, LLC, Sabre Defence Holdings, LLC and Guy Savage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cadence Bank, N.A. v. Latting Road Partners, LLC, et al
as 10-5883
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CADENCE BANK, N.A.
Defendant - Appellant:
LATTING ROAD PARTNERS, LLC, WILLIAM D. MILLER and WILLIAM R. HYNEMAN
Cadence Bank, N.A. v. Latting Road Partners, LLC, et al
as 10-5544
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CADENCE BANK, N.A.
Defendant - Appellant:
LATTING ROAD PARTNERS, LLC, WILLIAM D. MILLER and WILLIAM R. HYNEMAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
