Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Rebekah Atkins v. Gregory Stivers, et al
as 21-5798
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REBEKAH A. ATKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
GREGORY N. STIVERS, DAVID J. HALE, CLARIA HORN BOOM and others
Rebekah Atkins v. Gregory Stivers, et al
as 21-5799
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REBEKAH A. ATKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
GREGORY N. STIVERS, DAVID J. HALE, CLARIA HORN BOOM and others
Atkins v. Stivers et al
as 3:2021cv00470
Plaintiff:
Rebekah A. Atkins
Defendant:
Chief District Judge Greg N. Stivers, District Judge David J. Hale, District Judge Claria H. Boom and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Edward Flint v. Charles Simpson, III
as 11-5727
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD H. FLINT
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES R. SIMPSON, III, Judge
Flint v. Simpson
as 3:2011cv00275
Plaintiff:
Edward H. Flint
Defendant:
Charles R. Simpson, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Connie Marshall v. Charles Simpson, III, et al
as 10-5640
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CONNIE MARSHALL
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES R. SIMPSON, III, Judge, JOHN G. HEYBURN, II, Judge, JENNIFER B. COFFMAN, Judge and others
Connie Marshall v. Charles Simpson, III, et al
as 10-5459
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CONNIE MARSHALL
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES R. SIMPSON, III, Judge, JOHN G. HEYBURN, II, Judge, JENNIFER B. COFFMAN, Judge and others
Daniel Cobble v. Charles Simpson, III, et al
as 10-5071
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL COBBLE
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES R. SIMPSON, III, DAVIE WHALIN, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General and others
Cobble v. Simpson et al
as 3:2009cv00682
Plaintiff:
Daniel Cobble
Defendant:
Charles R. Simpson, III, Dave Whalin, Eric Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Cobble v. Simpson et al
as 3:2008cv00668
Plaintiff:
Daniel Cobble
Defendant:
Charles R. Simpson, III and Mike Simpson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
