Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00855
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00363
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Perry v. Chase Auto Finance et al
as 2:2017cv10017
Plaintiff:
Bruce K Perry
Defendant:
Chase Auto Finance and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chase Auto Finance Corporation v. Turner
as 4:2016cv00610
Defendant:
Vernon Lamont Turner
Plaintiff:
Chase Auto Finance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chase Auto Finance Corporation v. Turner
as 4:2016cv00171
Defendant:
Vernon Lamont Turner
Plaintiff:
Chase Auto Finance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Banaszak v. CitiMortgage, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv13710
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Banaszak
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc. , Bay County Treasurer, Chase Auto Finance Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 2733
Williams v. Chase Auto Finance Corporation et al
as 4:2012cv15692
Defendant:
Chase Auto Finance Corporation and Best Recovery Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Roslyn Williams
Rushing v. Chase Auto Finance Corp. et al
as 5:2011cv00419
Plaintiff:
Marcie Rushing
Defendant:
Chase Auto Finance Corp. and Leading Edge Recovery Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Hayes v. Asset Recovery Management, et al
as 3:2010cv01098
Plaintiff:
Phenique Hayes
Defendant:
Asset Recovery Management , Asset Recovery Management Group, Ltd, , Diversified Recovery Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Midwest Agency Services, Inc., et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA, et al
as 10-5401
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIDWEST AGENCY SERVICES, INC. and PREMIER DEALER SERVICES, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA, CHASE AUTO FINANCE CORP. and CHASE INSURANCE AGENCY, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
