Cases 1 - 10 of 83
Mathews v. Guinn et al
as 5:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Melvin Deandre Mathews
Defendant:
Sherri Guinn, Christian County Jail and Kenton County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 IDEA: Challenge decision re education for handicapped
Wallace v. Christian County, Kentucky et al
as 5:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Toni L. Wallace
Defendant:
Christian County, Kentucky, Adam Smith, Joseph M. Brannon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. DPA Office Hopkinsville KY et al
as 1:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
DPA Office Hopskinville KY, Christian County, Darrin Higgs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Forte v. City of Hopkinsville et al
as 5:2023cv00147
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Forte et al
Defendant:
City of Hopkinsville and Christian County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gee v. Stagner et al
as 5:2023cv00082
Plaintiff:
Geunni LaVorta Gee
Defendant:
Mike Stagner and Christian County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Christian County Jail
as 5:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
Byran Christopher Jones
Defendant:
Christian County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Akers v. Hicks et al
as 5:2022cv00178
Plaintiff:
Lena Akers
Defendant:
Deputy Gary Hicks, Aaron Acree, Trigg County Fiscal Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Brandon Harris v. Brian Rives, et al
as 22-5838
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDON MARQUE HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT BRIAN RIVES, DEPUTY J. L. HENDRICKS, DEPUTY JOHN HURT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
