Cases 1 - 10 of 574
Colvin v. USA
as 1:2024cv00261
Petitioner:
Mashi Colvin
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Deas v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County et al
as 5:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Deandrae Deas
Defendant:
Lexington-Fayette Urban County, Kenneth Atkerson, Jeramie Waak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Colvin v. K.S.P.
as 5:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Lawaun Montez Colvin
Defendant:
K.S.P.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Colvin v. Wilson
as 5:2023cv00142
Plaintiff:
Lawaun Montez Colvin
Defendant:
K.S.P. Officer Jimmie Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parsley v. Colvin et al
as 5:2023cv00253
Plaintiff:
Chad Parsley
Defendant:
G. Scott Colvin, Major Matt Lemonds, Hector Joyner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph Colvin v. John Gilley
as 23-5745
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSEPH LAYMOND COLVIN
Respondent / Appellee:
JOHN GILLEY, Warden
Kelsey v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government et al
as 5:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
Scott Michael Kelsey
Defendant:
Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government, Lisa Farmer, Rodney Ballard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Costick et al v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government et al
as 5:2023cv00198
Plaintiff:
Jason Costick and Joey Bardelas
Defendant:
Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government, Lisa Farmer, Scott Colvin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Colvin v. Gilley
as 6:2023cv00122
Petitioner:
Joseph Colvin
Respondent:
Warden Gilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Channel Partners, LLC v. Rhombus, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01735
Plaintiff:
Channel Partners, LLC and Channel Partners Capital, LLC
Defendant:
Rhombus, LLC and Dashon Colvin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
