Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 50
French v. The Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Justice; LFUCG et al
as 5:2023cv00324
Plaintiff: Antwon Francois French and A.I.R
Defendant: The Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Justice; LFUCG, Traci H Brislin doing business as Traci Hamlin Brislin doing business as Traci Hamlin, Boyd Minnifield and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
Couch v. Clay County et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2023cv00096
Plaintiff: Michael Wayne Couch
Defendant: Commonwealth Attorney's Office of Clay County, Gary Gregory, Harold Rader and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Couch v. Clay County et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2023cv00068
Plaintiff: Michael Wayne Couch
Defendant: Commonwealth Attorney's Office of Clay County, Gary Gregory and Harold Rader
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Couch v. Clay County Sheriff Office et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2023cv00042
Plaintiff: Michael Wayne Couch
Defendant: Clay County Sheriff Office, Patrick Robinson, Jerrod Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Antonio Sanderson v. Steven Healey, et al
as 23-5077
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANTONIO DESHAWN SANDERSON
Defendant / Appellee: DETECTIVE STEVEN HEALEY, #2444, in his individual and official capacity, LOUISVILLE METRO GOVERNMENT, LOUISVILLE METRO POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Planned Parenthood Great Northwest, Hawaii, Alaska v. Daniel Cameron, et al
as 22-5832
Plaintiff / Appellee: PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT NORTHWEST, HAWAII, ALASKA, INDIANA AND KENTUCKY, INC., on behalf of itself, its staff, and its patients
Intervenor / Appellee: EMW WOMEN'S SURGICAL CENTER, P.S.C. and ERNEST MARSHALL, M.D.
Defendant / Appellant: DANIEL J. CAMERON, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Kentucky
Defendant: ERIC FRIEDLANDER, in his official capacity as Secretary of Kentucky's Cabinet for Health and Family Services, MICHAEL S. RODMAN, in his official capacity as Executive Director of Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure and THOMAS B. WINE, in his official capacity as Commonwealth's Attorney for the 30th Judicial Circuit of Kentucky
Planned Parenthood Great Northwest, Hawaii, Alaska, et al v. Daniel Cameron, et al
as 22-5451
Plaintiff / Appellee: PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT NORTHWEST, HAWAII, ALASKA, INDIANA AND KENTUCKY, INC., on behalf of itself, its staff, and its patients
Defendant / Appellant: DANIEL J. CAMERON, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Kentucky
Defendant: ERIC FRIEDLANDER, in his official capacity as Secretary of Kentucky's Cabinet for Health and Family Services, MICHAEL S. RODMAN, in his official capacity as Executive Director of Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure and THOMAS B. WINE, in his official capacity as Commonwealth's Attorney for the 30th Judicial Circuit of Kentucky
Intervenor / Appellee: EMW WOMEN'S SURGICAL CENTER, P.S.C. and ERNEST MARSHALL, M.D.
Antwon French v. David Hester, et al
as 22-5210
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANTWON FRENCH, aka Markell Moore
Defendant / Appellee: DAVID BRYAN HESTER, LEXINGTON-FAYETTE URBAN COUNTY GOVERNMENT DIVISION OF POLICE, Fayette Commonwealth's Attorney's Office, LOU ANNA RED CORN and others
Nickie Miller v. Montgomery County, KY, et al
as 21-6076
Plaintiff / Appellant: NICKIE MILLER
Defendant / Appellee: MONTGOMERY COUNTY, KY, MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHERIFF FRED SHORTRIDGE, in his individual capacity, MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT OFFICERS, in their individual capacity and others
Holyparadox Apollyon v. Trinity Tillman, et al
as 20-5895
Plaintiff / Appellant: HOLYPARADOX ALLAH APOLLYON
Defendant / Appellee: SADMIRA RAMIE, Public Defender, EMILY T. WEATHERHOLT, Commonwealth Attorney, JUDGE KATIE KING and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?