Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Douglas Jackson v. Nathan Hoffman
as 23-2065
Petitioner / Appellant: DOUGLAS CORNELL JACKSON
Respondent / Appellee: NATHAN HOFFMAN, Warden
Douglas Jackson v. David Pynnonen, et al
as 23-1735
Plaintiff / Appellant: DOUGLAS CORNELL JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee: SERGEANT DAVID PYNNONEN and PRISON GUARD CODY HAATAJA
Douglas Jackson v. Quentin Bolton, et al
as 23-1701
Plaintiff / Appellant: DOUGLAS CORNELL JACKSON, named as Douglas Jackson
Defendant / Appellee: DEPUTY WARDEN HOULT, individual and official capacity, LIBRARIAN BOMER, individual and official capacity, COUNSELOR KEVIN COLLISON, individual and official capacity and others
Douglas JacksonIn re: Douglas Jackson
as 23-1670
Petitioner: In re: DOUGLAS CORNELL JACKSON
Jackson #748757 v. Bolton et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00122
Plaintiff: Douglas Cornell Jackson #748757
Defendant: Quentin Bolton, Unknown Hoult, Unknown Bomer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Douglas Jackson v. David Pynnonen, et al
as 23-1437
Plaintiff / Appellant: DOUGLAS CORNELL JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee: SERGEANT DAVID PYNNONEN and PRISON GUARD CODY HAATAJA
Douglas Jackson v. Thomas Perttu, et al
as 23-1420
Plaintiff / Appellant: DOUGLAS CORNELL JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee: SERGEANT DAVID PYNNONEN and THOMAS PERTTU, Acting Deputy Warden
Douglas Jackson v. David Pynnonen, et al
as 23-1348
Plaintiff / Appellant: DOUGLAS CORNELL JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee: SERGEANT DAVID PYNNONEN and PRISON GUARD CODY HAATAJA
Douglas JacksonIn re: Douglas Jackson
as 22-2152
Petitioner: In re: DOUGLAS CORNELL JACKSON
Jackson #748757 v. Schafer et al
as 1:2022cv01137
Plaintiff: Douglas Cornell Jackson #748757
Defendant: Unknown Schafer and Unknown Ldesma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?