Cases 1 - 10 of 83
CRAIN v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65685
Plaintiff:
LAUREN CRAIN
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Crain v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65581
Plaintiff:
Serena R. Crain
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Siraj Ibrihim v. Dewun Settle, et al
as 24-5302
Plaintiff:
SIRAJ IBRIHIM, aka Robert J. Crain
Defendant:
DEWUN R. SETTLE, WARDEN SHELBY COUNTY CORRECTIONS, U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE and others
Siraj Ibrihim v. Dewun Settle, et al
as 24-5258
Plaintiff:
SIRAJ IBRIHIM, aka Robert J. Crain
Defendant:
DEWUN R. SETTLE, WARDEN SHELBY COUNTY CORRECTIONS, U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE and others
Crain v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00890
Plaintiff:
Scott Crain
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Siraj Ibrihim v. Dewun Settles, et al
as 23-5731
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SIRAJ IBRIHIM, aka Robert J. Crain
Defendant / Appellee:
DEWUN R. SETTLE, WARDEN SHELBY COUNTY CORRECTIONS, U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE and others
Ibrihim v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2023cv02509
Petitioner:
Siraj Ibrihim and Robert Crain
Respondent:
United States Bureau of Prisons and John Doe of United States Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00499
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Ibrihim v. Settles et al
as 2:2022cv02847
Plaintiff:
Siraj Ibrihim and Robert Crain
Defendant:
Dewun Settles, Warden Shelby County Corrections, United States Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
