Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Etheredge et al v. Yost et al
as 3:2023cv01497
Plaintiff:
Christine Amber Etheredge
Defendant:
Attorney General Yost, State of Ohio, Ada Police and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Emily Beebe
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Jordan v. USA et al
as 1:2022cv00534
Plaintiff:
Prince Terrell D. Jordan and Tracy Halsell
Defendant:
USA, DOJ, AG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ross v. The United States of America et al
as 2:2019cv00845
Defendant:
US Marshalls, Department of Justice & Ohio DOJ, Ross County, OH and others
Plaintiff:
Randy G. Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Galanis v. United States of America et al
as 4:2015cv01536
Plaintiff:
James S. Galanis
Defendant:
United States of America and U.S. DOJ BOP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Mehmeti v. Warden FCI Elkton et al
as 4:2014cv00547
Petitioner:
Faik Mehmeti
Respondent:
Warden FCI Elkton and US DOJ BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. CCA Corporate Office et al
as 4:2013cv02721
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
CCA Corporate Office, Michael Pugh, CCA NEOCC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burnes v. Obama et al
as 2:2013cv00405
Plaintiff:
Ellyn Burnes
Defendant:
Barack Obama, Eric Holder, Robert Mueller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Riascos v. Rushing et al
as 4:2009cv01564
Petitioner:
Omar Riascos
Respondent:
Roddie Rushing, USA, NEOCC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Haque et al v. Mukasey et al
as 4:2009cv00155
Plaintiff:
Abrar U. Haque, Abrar CPA, Inc, Nuzaira Haque and others
Defendant:
Michael Mukasey, Alberto Gonzales, U.S. Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
