Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Pryor et al v. Anderson et al
as 4:2023cv00125
Plaintiff:
Judy A. Pryor and Arnold L. Pryor
Defendant:
Daniel D. Anderson and Orthopaedic Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Bailey v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv03468
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Daniel D. Bailey
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Brittany Hyre Anculle, et al v. USA
as 22-5494
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRITTANY N. HYRE ANCULLE, JAMES H. BARNES, LISA M. BATES and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Daniel Benham v. CIR
as 19-1938
Petitioner / Appellant:
DANIEL D. BENHAM
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Sheets v. Doe, MD et al
as 3:2019cv00038
Plaintiff:
Daniel D. Sheets
Defendant:
Dr. Jane/John Doe, John Doe, MD and John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Lynch et al
as 0:2018cv00077
Defendant:
Anthony B. Carrington, Amy L. Lynch and Daniel D. Lynch
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Anculle et al v. United States of America
as 3:2018cv00308
Plaintiff:
Anna M. Kraujalis, Priscilla A. Blackburn, Malibu K. Messer and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Jones v. Hill et al
as 2:2018cv02511
Defendant:
United States Postal Service ("USPS") and Danielle D. Hill
Plaintiff:
Carlostine D. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364
Corizon Health, Inc. v. CorrecTek, Inc. et al
as 5:2017cv00035
Plaintiff:
Corizon Health, Inc.
Defendant:
CorrecTek, Inc. , Burton Ulrich , Daniel D Jarrett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
