Cases filed in Ohio
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,148
Arvin v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02909
Plaintiff: George Arvin
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Vasiloff v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02712
Plaintiff: Sr. George Vasiloff
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Franko v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02573
Plaintiff: George Franko
Defendant: Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Doe v. Cuyahoga County et al.
as 1:2024cv00878
Plaintiff: Jane Doe
Defendant: Cuyahoga County, Cuyahoga County Council, MetroHealth System and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Willis v. USA
as 1:2024cv00283
Petitioner: George Willis
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Taylor v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv00772
Plaintiff: Christopher George Taylor
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Miller v. Hudson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00098
Plaintiff: John Holsen Miller
Defendant: George Hudson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burton v. Frederick
as 3:2024cv00685
Petitioner: Shasta Burton
Respondent: Warden George Frederick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rogers v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01327
Plaintiff: George Rogers
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harbison v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65139
Plaintiff: George Harbison
Defendant: Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?