Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Duty et al v. Kentucky Hospital, LLC et al
as 5:2022cv00068
Plaintiff:
Molly Duty, Erica Duty, Jason Duty and others
Defendant:
Kentucky Hospital, LLC doing business as Clark Regional Medical Center, MD John F. Greene, III, Associates for Women's Care, PSC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Clark Robertson v. Univ of Akron School of Law, et al
as 21-3768
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLARK A. ROBERTSON
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIVERSITY OF AKRON SCHOOL OF LAW, DEAN CHRISTOPHER J. PETERS, University of Akron School of Law, ASSIST. DEAN CHARLES WAYNE OLDFIELD, University of Akron School of Law and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv01907
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Simpson v. Louisville Metro Government et al
as 3:2019cv00629
Plaintiff:
Shayla L Simpson
Defendant:
Mark Bolton, Officer Joy L. Wilson, Officer Ladawn M. Krantz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv
Patric Pope v. Shawn Phillips, et al
as 19-5300
Defendant / Appellee:
SHAWN PHILLIPS, Warden, C.E.R.T. TEAM, M.C.C.X., JOHN DOES, Green Team Employees 1 - 4 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRIC POPE
Reid v. Green et al
as 7:2013cv00075
Plaintiff:
Jason Reid
Defendant:
John B. Green and Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois
Cross_claimant:
Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois
Cross_defendant:
John B. Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Pipefitters Local 636, et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of
as 12-2265
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 636, Trustees of Pipefitters Local 636 Insurance Fund, JOHN R. GREEN, CHARLES INMAN and others
Defendant - Appellant:
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF MICHIGAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
