Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Wyatt et al v. United States of America
as 3:2014cv00616
Plaintiff:
Megan N. Wyatt , Victoria L. King , Ashton E. Key and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Doles et al v. Market Merchandisers, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01107
Plaintiff:
Donald Doles and Christy Smith
Defendant:
Market Merchandisers, Inc., Sylvia R. Speight and Ernest L. King, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
King v. Wade et al
as 2:2013cv02167
Plaintiff:
Hattie L. King
Defendant:
Randy Wade, Steve Cohen, A.C. Wharton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
King v. Leading Edge Recovery Solutions, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv00380
Plaintiff:
Jennifer L King
Defendant:
Leading Edge Recovery Solutions, LLC and Asset Acceptance, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
King v. Asset Acceptance, LLC
as 2:2012cv00378
Plaintiff:
Jennifer L King
Defendant:
Asset Acceptance, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
King v. AllianceOne Receivables Management, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00314
Plaintiff:
Jennifer L King
Defendant:
AllianceOne Receivables Management, Inc. and Capital One Bank (USA), National Association
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
King v. Garner et al
as 2:2012cv02490
Plaintiff:
Hattie L. King
Defendant:
John Garner and Oliver Pugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Velocity Investments, LLC
as 2:2012cv00170
Plaintiff:
Jennifer L King
Defendant:
Velocity Investments, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
King v. Encore Capital Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00074
Plaintiff:
Jennifer L King
Defendant:
Encore Capital Group, Inc., Midland Funding, LLC, MRC Receivables Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
