Cases 1 - 9 of 9
QBE Insurance Corporation et al v. Lisa J's Escort Service et al
as 5:2020cv00167
Defendant:
Lisa K. Jackson doing business as Lisa J's Escort Service, James M. Jackson and Lisa J's Escort Service
Plaintiff:
QBE Insurance Corporation and Keen Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moler v. Mabe et al
as 6:2019cv00203
Petitioner:
Arthur Flemming Moler
Respondent:
Jason Sickler, Christopher Mabe, C. Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. Bunch et al
as 1:2019cv00091
Defendant:
Angela M. Jackson, Celestina B. Bunch, Christopher H. Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Moler v. Lawson et al
as 6:2019cv00149
Defendant:
Angela Dunbar, Christopher Mabe, Ms. J. Free and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur Flemming Moler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hamilton v. Morehouse et al
as 3:2010cv00459
Plaintiff:
Deanne W. Hamilton
Defendant:
Melissa D. Morehouse and James M. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jackson et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 3:2008cv00189
Plaintiff:
Ingeborg M. Jackson, Ingeborg M. Jackson, Ingeborg M. Jackson and others
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation, GlaxoSmithKline, PLC, Glaxo Wellcome UK Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Jackson v. Mills
as 1:2008cv00015
Petitioner:
Matthew M. Jackson
Respondent:
Tommy Mills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Horton-Bey v. Hastings et al
as 7:2007cv00179
Plaintiff:
Tyrone A. Horton-Bey
Defendant:
Suzanne R. Hastings, Terreo Leibel, R. Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horton-Bey v. Hastings
as 7:2007cv00132
Plaintiff:
Tyrone A. Horton-Bey
Defendant:
Suzanne R. Hastings, R. Ramirez, S. Conrotto and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
