Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Julian Hood, Jr. v. USPS, et al
as 17-1406
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIAN R. HOOD, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Postmaster General, in her individual and professional capacity, MARYL R. ROSEN, USPS Attorney, in her individual and professional capacity and others
Julian Hood, Jr. v. USPS, et al
as 17-1404
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIAN R. HOOD, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Postmaster General
Julian Hood, Jr. v. USPS, et al
as 17-1053
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIAN R. HOOD, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Postmaster General, in her individual and professional capacity, MARYL R. ROSEN, USPS Attorney, in her individual and professional capacity and others
Julian Hood, Jr. v. USPS, et al
as 17-1052
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIAN R. HOOD, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Postmaster General, in her individual and professional capacity, MARYL R. ROSEN, USPS Attorney, in her individual and professional capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-6473
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-6113
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv12104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-5505
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Julian Hood, Jr. v. USPS, et al
as 15-1768
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIAN R. HOOD, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Postmaster General, in her individual and professional capacity, MARYL R. ROSEN, USPS Attorney, in her individual and professional capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
