Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Bovenzi v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv00185
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Michael Brandon Bovenzi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Clarkson v. Lebo
as 3:2019cv00418
Defendant:
Jonathan Lebo
Plaintiff:
Michael Brandon Clarkson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henson v. Daviess County Detention Center Medical Staff
as 4:2016cv00169
Plaintiff:
Michael Brandon Henson
Defendant:
Daviess County Detention Center Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 1:2015cv00115
Plaintiff:
Michael Brandon Adams
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction, Tony Parker, Jason Woodall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Adams v. Tammy Ford
as 15-5451
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL BRANDON ADAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
TAMMY FORD
Michael Adams v. Jason Woodall, et al
as 15-5450
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL BRANDON ADAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
JASON WOODALL, DOUGLAS STEPHENS, RONALD TURNER and others
Adams v. Holloway
as 3:2014cv01055
Petitioner:
Michael Brandon Adams
Respondent:
James Holloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adams v. Woodall et al
as 3:2014cv00020
Plaintiff:
Michael Brandon Adams
Defendant:
Jason Woodall, Douglas Stephens, Ronald Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Adams v. David Osborne, et al
as 13-5447
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL BRANDON ADAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFF NANCE, officially as CC3 and individually, RUSTY HALL, officially as Classification Coordinator and individually, DEAN HALL, officially as Disciplinary Board Chairman and individually and others
Russell v. Sealey et al
as 1:2012cv00154
Plaintiff:
Michael Brandon Russell
Defendant:
Floyd Sealey, Enoch George and Deborah Wagonshultz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
