Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Nalls v. Montgomery County Prosecutor's Office et al
as 3:2022cv00243
Plaintiff:
Larry Nalls
Defendant:
Montgomery County Prosecutor's Office, Mathis H. Heck, Lee C. Falke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitman Jr. v. State Of Ohio et al
as 3:2022cv00283
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Pitman Jr.
Defendant:
State of Ohio Inc., Montgomery County, Montgomery County Common Pleas Court Domestic Relations Division and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Larry Nalls v. State of OH, et al
as 22-3515
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY NALLS
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF OHIO, Montgomery County Common Pleas Court, MICHAEL PAUL BRUSH, ANTHONY A. AHBOUD and others
Black v. Montgomery County Common Pleas Court et al
as 3:2018cv00123
Plaintiff:
Cory O. Black
Defendant:
Montgomery County Common Pleas Court, Dayton Police Department, Montgomery County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Montgomery County Common Pleas Court Domestic Relations Division et al
as 3:2017cv00341
Plaintiff:
Lamont Washington
Defendant:
Montgomery County Common Pleas Court Domestic Relations Division, Gregory A. Brush, Timothy D Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Gilmore v. Montgomery County Common Pleas Court
as 3:2016cv00240
Plaintiff:
Leonard C Gilmore
Defendant:
Montgomery County Common Pleas Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. Singer et al
as 3:2016cv00142
Plaintiff:
Flora B Jones
Defendant:
Gregory F Singer , Edward T Mohler , Patricia A Upton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gilmore v. Montgomery County Common Pleas Court
as 3:2012cv00163
Plaintiff:
Leonard C Gilmore
Defendant:
Montgomery County Common Pleas Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
