Cases 1 - 10 of 17
The Kroger Co. v. Marten Transport Services, Ltd.
as 1:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
The Kroger Co.
Defendant:
Marten Transport Services, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Marten Transport, Ltd. v. Logistical Advantage Corp.
as 1:2022cv01118
Plaintiff:
Marten Transport, Ltd.
Defendant:
Logistical Advantage Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Martens v. City of Findlay et al
as 3:2022cv00914
Defendant:
Robison, Curphey & O'Connell, LLC, Corey L. Tomlinson, City of Findlay and others
Plaintiff:
George Martens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Marten Transport, Ltd. v. Morrison III et al
as 5:2021cv01646
Plaintiff:
Marten Transport, Ltd.
Defendant:
Preston T. Morrison III and Nicholas K. Ryan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martens v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv05043
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Martens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00853
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Martens et al v. City of Findlay et al
as 3:2018cv01963
Plaintiff:
Thelma Martens and George Martens
Defendant:
Ohio Attorney General, Jodi Mathias, City of Findlay and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Martens vs City of Findlay, et al
as 3:2018cv01826
Plaintiff:
Thelma Martens and George Martens
Defendant:
City of Findlay, Mayor Lydia Mihalik, Donald Rasmussen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCartney v. Marten Transport Ltd.
as 3:2018cv00538
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. McCartney
Defendant:
Marten Transport Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martens et al v. City of Findlay et al
as 3:2017cv01058
Plaintiff:
George Martens and Thelma Martens
Defendant:
City of Findlay, Lydia Mihalik, Donald Rasmussen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
