Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv12809
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv12510
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Martinez v. McAleenan et al
as 1:2019cv00984
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Daniel Renaud, Kenneth T Cuccinelli and others
Plaintiff:
Marcelino Noe Barahona Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00970
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446
Roehling et al v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2011cv00012
Plaintiff:
Carol Roehling and Ahamad Shalash
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security , District Director, Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services , Director, U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Ladyga v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 2:2008cv10266
Plaintiff:
Grazyna Piatkowska Ladyga
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Service and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
