Cases 1 - 10 of 929
Mark Gooding v. Parole Board, et al
as 24-1438
Petitioner:
MARK ANTHONY GOODING
Respondent:
PAROLE BOARD and MICHELLE FLOYD, Warden
Trubiano v. Munson et al
as 2:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Chris A. Trubiano
Defendant:
Andrew Munson, Kentucky Probation & Parole and Cookie Crews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burton v. Illinois Dept of Corrections Parole Board
as 2:2024cv02259
Petitioner:
Stephon Depaul Burton
Respondent:
Illinois Dept of Corrections Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Trubiano v. Munson et al
as 4:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Chris A. Trubiano
Defendant:
Andrew Munson, Kentucky Probation & Parole and Cookie Crews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
English v. Tennessee Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 1:2024cv01071
Plaintiff:
Jon English
Defendant:
Tennessee Board of Probation and Parole, Core Civic Prison and RDAP Supervisor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ouellette v. Michigan Department of Corrections Parole Board et al
as 2:2024cv10750
Plaintiff:
Scott Mitchell Ouellette
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections Parole Board and Warden
Martin v. Whitmer et al
as 5:2024cv10551
Plaintiff:
Christien D. Martin
Defendant:
Gretchen Whitmer, Heidi Washington, John Christiansen and others
Taylor v. Tennessee Board of Parole et al
as 1:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Corey Taylor
Defendant:
Tennessee Board of Parole and Dora Werner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
Jermaine L. Hunter
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Tennessee Board of Paroles and Amber Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. T.D.O.C. et al
as 1:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wilson
Defendant:
T.D.O.C. and Tennessee Board of Parole and Probation The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
