Cases 1 - 10 of 96
Redmon et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03274
Plaintiff:
Robert Redmon and Alanna Shelton
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Chappel v. Hunter et al
as 1:2024cv00318
Plaintiff:
Dawn Chappel
Defendant:
Magistrate David Hunter, Magistrate Margaret Clark, Judge Brett Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Batson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03044
Plaintiff:
Shelton Batson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Taper v. Tabor et al
as 1:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Joshua Taper
Defendant:
Jon Tabor, Tammy Shelton, Amber Stanley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01317
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
Curtis v. Lewis et al
as 1:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Curtis
Defendant:
Deborah Lewis, Doug Glispy, Bradford English and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Shelton et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04138
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Shelton and Mark Shelton
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Chappel v. Hunter et al
as 1:2023cv00728
Plaintiff:
Dawn M Chappel
Defendant:
Magistrate David M Hunter, Tyler Cantrell, Mackenzie Carrington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shelton v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03964
Plaintiff:
Michael Shelton
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc., Bard Davol, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00483
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
