Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Alan v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2024cv00953
Plaintiff:
David P. Alan
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden, FCI Elkton, Warden, FCI Loretto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mirafuentes-Valdez v. Warden, FCI Elkton
as 4:2023cv01289
Petitioner:
Jesus Mirafuentes-Valdez and Warden, FCI Elkton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rodriguez-Robles v. Warden, FCI Elkton
as 4:2023cv01285
Petitioner:
David Rodriguez-Robles
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Elkton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Joseph Moreno v. Warden, FCI Elkton
as 23-3172
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSEPH MARIO MORENO
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, FCI ELKTON
Bani Moreno v. Warden, FCI Elkton
as 22-3965
Petitioner / Appellant:
BANI MORENO
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, FCI ELKTON
Moreno v. Warden FCI Elkton
as 4:2022cv01659
Petitioner:
Bani Moreno
Respondent:
Warden FCI Elkton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ewell v. Warden, FCI Elkton
as 4:2022cv01675
Petitioner:
Eric Ewell
Respondent:
Warden and Warden, FCI Elkton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pontefract v. United States of America et al
as 4:2022cv01683
Plaintiff:
Clyde Pontefract
Defendant:
United States of America and Warden FCI Elkton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Nieves v. Warden, FCI Elkton
as 4:2019cv01966
Respondent:
Warden FCI Elkton
Petitioner:
Maximino Nieves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Keelan Harris v. FBOP, et al
as 19-3585
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEELAN HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
LT. CRAIG BRINKER, J.L. NORWOOD, Former Regional Director, Northeast Region, In His Individual and Official Capacity, BILL STORY, Associate Warden FCI Elkton, In His Individual and Official Capacity and others
Defendant:
FBOP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
