Cases 1 - 10 of 161
Darrell Rogers v. Nevin Webster, et al
as 24-1516
Plaintiff:
DARRELL ROGERS
Defendant:
NEVIN WEBSTER and BRETT HELMER
James Lockridge v. Charles Larson, et al
as 23-2423
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES LOCKRIDGE
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES LARSON, CANDACE WHITMAN and ROGER KRANTZ
Antwan Carruthers v. Elkhart County Jail, et al
as 23-2054
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTWAN M. CARRUTHERS, also known as MRS. EYE KEYLA MY. CARRUTHERS WASHINGTON
Defendant / Appellee:
ELKHART COUNTY JAIL, ELKHART COUNTY CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX, B. ROGERS, Deputy Lieutenant and others
Roger Sims-Bey v. Jason Jester, et al
as 23-1779
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROGER SIMS-BEY
Defendant / Appellee:
JASON JESTER, JUSTIN HAMMERS, CERRYLE HINTHORNE and others
Roger Day, Jr. v. T. Watson
as 23-1072
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROGER C. DAY, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
T. J. WATSON, Warden
Antwan Carruthers v. Elkhart County Jail, et al
as 23-1030
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTWAN M. CARRUTHERS, also known as MRS. EYE KEYLA MY. CARRUTHERS WASHINGTON
Defendant / Appellee:
ELKHART COUNTY JAIL, ECCC, Administration, ST. JOSEPH COUNTY and others
Marlon Watford v. Howard Harner, et al
as 22-1673
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARLON L. WATFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
HOWARD HARNER, JIM WINTERS, Food Supervisor, ROGER KERN and others
George Bojszuk v. Curtis Julious, et al
as 21-3401
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GEORGE BOJSZUK
Defendant / Appellee:
CURTIS JULIOUS, ROGER VINES, Officer and LAKE COUNTY, ILLINOIS
Dennis Strong v. Wisconsin Department of Correc, et al
as 18-2132
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS STRONG
Defendant - Appellee:
WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, AARON SABEL, ROGER NEVEAU and others
Paul Barksdale v. Roger Scott, et al
as 18-2094
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL KEITH BARKSDALE
Defendant - Appellee:
ROGER SCOTT, Sheriff, DEKALB COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, JEREMY GRUBBS, #4230 Detective and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
