Cases 101 - 110 of 1,415
Robert Decker v. Katherine Sireveld, et al
as 23-1725
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT K. DECKER
Defendant / Appellee:
KATHERINE SIREVELD, Legal Deprtment of terre Haute & Marion F.C.I.'s, MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States, MICHAEL CARVAJAL and others
Juan Santiago Lopez v. Merrick Garland
as 23-2081
Petitioner:
JUAN SANTIAGO LOPEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Antwan Carruthers v. Elkhart County Jail, et al
as 23-2054
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTWAN M. CARRUTHERS, also known as MRS. EYE KEYLA MY. CARRUTHERS WASHINGTON
Defendant / Appellee:
ELKHART COUNTY JAIL, ELKHART COUNTY CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX, B. ROGERS, Deputy Lieutenant and others
Xinying Yu v. Merrick Garland
as 23-1981
Petitioner:
XINYING YU
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Patrick Wallace v. USA
as 23-1602
Petitioner / Appellant:
PATRICK B. WALLACE
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Edward Abernathy v. Charles Heck, et al
as 23-1672
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD ABERNATHY
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES W. HECK, Correctional Officer, JAMES C. BELFORD, OBADIAH MIMS and others
Chunyu Wu v. Merrick B. Garland
as 23-1916
Petitioner:
CHUNYU WU
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Maria Aragon-Velasquez, et al v. Merrick B. Garland
as 23-1875
Petitioner:
MARIA JULIA ARAGON-VELASQUEZ, JOHANA MARIA GARCIA-ARAGON and MARCOS ANTONIO CORTEZ-ARAGON
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Clarence Jackson v. Mark Goodwin, et al
as 23-1485
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLARENCE B. JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK S. GOODWIN, FIRST FINANCIAL BANK and DAVIS AND DELANOIS LAW FIRM
Enedelia Ocampo Abarca, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 23-1815
Petitioner:
ENEDELIA OCAMPO ABARCA, O. G. O., minor, V. G. O., minor and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
